Extremism rarely has a productive outcome.
Paul D. McInerny
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Autumn
Winter is an etching,
spring a watercolor,
summer an oil painting and
autumn a mosaic of them all.
Stanley Horowitz
NINE WORDS WOMEN USE
This was sent to me by a female friend. Perhaps she sent it for humor. Perhaps she sent it as a warning. Whatever the reason, there is a tinge of truth. I have heard and experienced all of the following. Enjoy(?)
(1) Fine: This is the word women use to end an argument when they are right and you need to shut up.
(2) Five Minutes: If she is getting dressed, this means one-half hour. Five minutes is only five minutes if you have just been given five more minutes to watch the game before helping around the house.
(3) Nothing: This is the calm before the storm. This means something, and you should be on your toes. Arguments that begin with nothing usually end in fine.
(4) Go Ahead: This is a dare, not permission. Don't Do It!
(5) Loud Sigh: This is actually a word, but is a non-verbal statement often misunderstood by men. A loud sigh means she thinks you are an idiot and wonders why she is wasting her time standing here and arguing with you about nothing. (Refer back to # 3 for the meaning of nothing.)
(6) That's Okay: This is one of the most dangerous statements a woman can make to a man. That's okay means she wants to think long and hard before deciding how and when you will pay for your mistake. (7) Thanks: A woman is thanking you, do not question, or faint. Just say you're welcome. (This is true, unless she says 'Thanks a lot' - which is PURE sarcasm and she is not thanking you at all. DO NOT say 'you're welcome' -- that will bring on a 'whatever'.)
(8) Whatever: Is a woman's way of saying .......
(9) Don't worry about it, I've got it: Another dangerous statement, meaning this is something that a woman has told a man to do several times, but is now doing it herself. This will later result in a man asking, 'What's wrong?' For the woman's response, refer to # 3.
(1) Fine: This is the word women use to end an argument when they are right and you need to shut up.
(2) Five Minutes: If she is getting dressed, this means one-half hour. Five minutes is only five minutes if you have just been given five more minutes to watch the game before helping around the house.
(3) Nothing: This is the calm before the storm. This means something, and you should be on your toes. Arguments that begin with nothing usually end in fine.
(4) Go Ahead: This is a dare, not permission. Don't Do It!
(5) Loud Sigh: This is actually a word, but is a non-verbal statement often misunderstood by men. A loud sigh means she thinks you are an idiot and wonders why she is wasting her time standing here and arguing with you about nothing. (Refer back to # 3 for the meaning of nothing.)
(6) That's Okay: This is one of the most dangerous statements a woman can make to a man. That's okay means she wants to think long and hard before deciding how and when you will pay for your mistake. (7) Thanks: A woman is thanking you, do not question, or faint. Just say you're welcome. (This is true, unless she says 'Thanks a lot' - which is PURE sarcasm and she is not thanking you at all. DO NOT say 'you're welcome' -- that will bring on a 'whatever'.)
(8) Whatever: Is a woman's way of saying .......
(9) Don't worry about it, I've got it: Another dangerous statement, meaning this is something that a woman has told a man to do several times, but is now doing it herself. This will later result in a man asking, 'What's wrong?' For the woman's response, refer to # 3.
Thursday, September 16, 2010
The Irish Woman
A beautiful, well-dressed Irish woman seats herself in the first class cabin on a cross-country flight, and settles herself in for the trip, smiling prettily at admiring passengers seated around her.
Underway, a flight attendant soon approaches the Irish woman and says, 'Miss, I'm sorry, but I see that your ticket is for coach, and you're seated in first class; I'm afraid you'll have to move.'
The woman replies, 'I'm Irish, and I'm beautiful, and I'm going to New York to be a model.'
Slightly incredulous, the attendant alerts the senior flight attendant.
The senior attendant approaches the woman and says, politely, 'I'm sorry, Miss, but since your ticket is for coach, you'll have to move back.'
The woman replies, sweetly, 'I'm Irish, and I'm beautiful, and I'm going to New York to be a model' -- and shows no signs of moving.
Frustrated, the senior attendant informs the captain, and he says he'll deal with the problem.
He turns over flight control, walks to the rear, and observes the woman seated comfortably in first class.
Approaching her with a smile, the captain leans over and speaks quietly into the Irish woman's ear. Almost immediately, the woman gathers her things, gets up, and moves quickly to the coach compartment.
Amazed, the senior flight attendant asks the captain, 'Captain, I'm impressed ... what did you say to her?'
The captain grinned slyly and said, 'I just told her that the first class cabin doesn't go to New York.'
Monday, September 13, 2010
Paul McInerny Charged With International Crime
Arrogant American
by Paul D. McInerny
How's that for a headline? Talk about tabloid journalism, but if the Saudi-based Organization of Islamic States (OIC) found the following blog offensive, I could be imprisoned or executed for the international crime of Blasphemy Against Islam. You read correctly. An international crime for blasphemy or ridicule of Islam. This blog entry is an observation and opinion to address some key issues:
1. Imam Rauf's remarks concerning the arrogance of Americans
2. Research regarding author's Nina Shea and Paul Marshall
3. The Saudi-based Organization of Islamic States (OIC) and their goals
The article does not address issues regarding:
1. Christianity vs. Islam
2. Controversy at Ground Zero
1. Imam Rauf: The Arrogance of Americans
While America and the rest of the world remain on the alert for gun toting, bomb carrying radical, Islamic terrorist, evidence suggests a more subtle approach may be occurring. A smoke screen of misdirected blame and anger renders the world near-sighted to the bigger picture.
The following introduction to Imam Rauf was taken from the CNN web site: Feisal Abdul Rauf is chairman of the nonprofit organization Cordoba Initiative and imam of Masjid al-Farah, a mosque in Lower Manhattan, and he is a planner of the proposed Islamic community center near ground zero. He gave the talk above in October 2009. Below is an excerpt from his book, "What's Right With Islam.”
“Americans must outgrow the unbecoming arrogance that leads us to assert that America somehow owns a monopoly on goodness and truth -- a belief that leads some to view the world as but a stage on which to play out the great historical drama: the United States of America versus the Powers of Evil.”
Ouch. Unbecoming arrogance. Imam Rauf lectures Americans as if he were a father scolding his insolent children. Unbecoming arrogance? There probably isn't a country in the world that isn't viewed by someone as arrogant, so how should one interpret Imam Rauf and his words? What countries or what part of the world views Americans as arrogant? Perhaps Americans are viewed as arrogant because our governments position after 9/11 was that you were either with us or against us. Merriam-Webster defines arrogance as an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions.
American’s do possess a certain attitude, but also know that they do not have a monopoly on goodness and truth. Is it arrogance or could it be pride? While not perfect by any means, America is a country that is constantly evolving. It is a country like no other, in that it was literally created by its people. When it stood defiantly against England and declared its independence, the founding fathers chose a government that was run by the people. They did not choose a dictatorship or monarchy, but rather a government that represented the common man.
America, like most countries, has a past. Indeed, its expansion was a brutal acquisition of land from its native inhabitants. America enslaved an entire race of people and suffered a civil war. During World War II, it interned American born Japanese and later, denied basic civil rights to African Americans. America is fluid in that it is capable of change and has evolved to where it is today.
Despite its sordid past, America is the country that appears to be admired by most of the world. People came to America and still come to America for a better life. Imam Rauf chose America as his home when he came in 1965 and became a citizen approximately 15 years later. Parents from other countries send their children here for quality education, to study at our colleges and universities.
Imam Rauf talks of America's "...historical drama: The United States versus The Powers of Evil." He says that as if it were something bad and appears to diminish or tarnish the United States and her role in the world. Imam Rauf is an American now, and perhaps he has glossed over parts of our history that he considers "historical drama." Maybe it has all been just historical drama when America helped her friends in time of need. She was there in World War I and the conflicts in Korea and Vietnam. After the surrender of Japan in World War II, America provided assistance to Japan to help them rebuild their war torn country. It was America and her allies that responded to the call for help from Kuwait and chased the invaders away. Historical drama, indeed.
Some evil appears in a different form. It could be pride from the fact that it is America that usually is the first to provide aid to any country suffering from catastrophic events such as tsunamis, earthquakes, floods and other natural disasters.
Americans are proud of their heritage and the standard of freedom that allows debate, challenges to the status quo, and the freedom to criticize its leaders and call them to the carpet. Americans are proud of their ability to travel unrestrained throughout this great country. They are proud of a government that functions by a set of laws and not the whim of any one person.
It is in America that one can burn the American flag and draw unflattering cartoons of the president of the United States. It is America where one can belong to or make light of the many, many religions flourishing in the country. It is in America, Imam Rauf, and not an Islamic based country, where people can actually have a critical debate on religion or politics. It is in America and not an Islamic based country, where one can feel free and unthreatened to put words to paper such as these.
Perfect? Absolutely not. One of the best countries in the world? Absolutely.
Because of our standard of living and our leadership in the free world, we have enemies who want to destroy us simply because our values do not coincide with theirs. They are intolerant of the United States. Americans just honored its 9th memory of the horrific events of September 11, 2001. The events that unfolded that day were caused by Islamic terrorists; a group of men who subverted the teachings in the Quran to justify their hatred toward Americans. Presidents Bush and Obama reminded us that we are not at war with Islam. September 11, 2001, was the result of evil, Islamic extremists.
2. Nina Shea and Paul Marshall
3. The Organization of Islamic States (OIC)
Imam Rauf is said to be a man of peace and that Islam, like most religions, is a religion of peace. Yet, there is a certain air of arrogance and intolerance on a segment of the Muslim world concerning the religion of Islam and they are not what one would immediately identify as extremists. Remember the Merriam-Webster definition that arrogance is an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions.
Let us look at “overbearing manner.” Pastor Terry Jone’s threatened to burn the Quran and many Muslims and non-Muslims found the idea offensive. The governments of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Sudan not only perceived the threat as offensive, but also a deliberate act of blasphemy, punishable by imprisonment or even execution. These countries and others belong to the Saudi-based Organization of Islamic States (OIC).
Nina Shea and Paul Marshall, Senior Fellows with Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom and co-authors of the forthcoming book “Silenced” wrote an article detailing what a reasonable person could construe as an over bearing manner. The OIC is increasingly intolerant of those who would dare speak ill of Islam. Nancy Gibbs, Senior Editor for Time Magazine wrote, "Intolerance comes in many forms; arrogance is one of them, as is dismissing one's opponents as being ignorant or bigoted rather than drawn deeply to different principles or priorities."
Since Feb. 14, 1989, when Iranian Ayatollah Khomeini pronounced Salman Rushdie a blasphemer and ordered his murder, the OIC lobbied Western governments to repress ridicule and critique of Islam, and dissent within Islam, in ways analogous to the repression already existing in many of its own countries.
So now we have governments, not demented individuals, intolerant of any ridicule or critique of Islam. The OIC lobbied to silence critics of Islam and is making progress toward that goal. This appears to be arrogant and over bearing.
For example, in the United Nations, the OIC has for over a decade successfully sponsored annual resolutions calling for the creation of an international crime against "defamation" of Islam. This demand that Western governments use state power to coerce compliance by their own citizens with Islamic blasphemy strictures is therefore relatively new.
The OIC wants an international crime against the defamation of Islam. While Imam Rauf talks of dialogue and tolerance, the OIC demands that any critique of Islam should be criminal throughout the world. The OIC has been successful for over a decade sponsoring resolutions toward an international crime. If you have listened to any of the news channels lately, almost all of their guests and some of the hosts would be guilty of blasphemy against Islam.
Western Europe, Canada and Australia have reacted to this demand largely ad hoc; they are beginning to deploy racial and religious hate-speech bans to serve as proxies for Muslim blasphemy laws.
Most Americans and probably the rest of the world are unaware of the repercussions the OIC’s demands have had on free speech.
Politician Geert Wilders is now on trial in the Netherlands for his statements, and for his film "Fitna," in which he sharply critiques the Quran and calls on Muslims to destroy it. In Germany, a man was recently convicted for the sacrilegious treatment of the word "Quran," not the Islamic sacred text itself. Since the mid-1990s, prosecutors in Finland, Canada and the Netherlands have trawled the websites of anti-immigration advocates looking for anti-Islamic comments.
In France, Canada, Norway and Italy, publishers, editors and authors – such as Mark Steyn – have been tried for inciting religious hostility and insulting religious sensibilities with their critiques of Islam and Muslim immigration.
It should come as no surprise then that former French actress Brigitte Bardot “has been convicted and fined five times under hate-speech laws for denouncing Islamic slaughter practices and making other derogatory statements concerning Islamic practices.”
Authors Shea and Marshall say that so far the United States is an exception, “with its strong protections of free speech under the First Amendment. In the United States, neither blasphemy nor hate speech are violations of the law. ("Hate crimes" simply provide for enhanced penalties when traditional crimes are directed against certain protected groups).”
As applied in OIC states, blasphemy rules can touch on every area of human endeavor. At stake are the freedoms of religion and expression that lie at the heart of our liberal democracy.
“The late Indonesian president Abdurrhaman Wahid warned that such efforts "play directly into the hands of fundamentalists, who wish to avoid all criticism of their attempts to narrow the scope of discourse regarding Islam, and to inter 1.3 billion Muslims in a narrow, suffocating chamber of dogmatism."
America and the rest of the world have concerned themselves with the extremist-those that would do us immediate and physical harm. While the extremists are banging on the front door, moderates are quietly coming in through the rear door. There are many good, decent and well meaning Americans who are opening that rear door. Perhaps they do not understand or refuse to believe the intentions of the Organization of Islamic States regarding Islam.
Final Word
Imam Rauf talks of the arrogance of Americans and our opposition to evil. In the context of this article, evil arrogance and intolerance is the belief criticism of Islam is punishable by imprisonment or execution. Evil arrogance and intolerance is the belief criticism of Islam should be an international crime. Evil arrogance and intolerance is the belief Islam should be the only religion above reproach, critique, discussion and questioning. Finally, arrogance is lecturing to your fellow Americans that our "great historical drama" is some how to blame for the events of 9/11. An evil, demented and intolerant ideology of extremists was the basic cause of 9/11.
Let us not succumb to intolerance, panic or hate because one follows Islam, but let us not close our eyes to the OIC and its goals for the sake of tolerance. There are governments who would have Americans feel guilty for all the ills of the world, but Americans have every right to be proud of their country and the ideals by which it was founded. We have stumbled, picked ourselves up, dusted off the dirt and marched forward. We have recognized and acknowledged our weaknesses, but are buoyed by our basic philosophy of decency and freedom that most of the world respects while members of the OIC detest.
Extremism for any ideology rarely has a productive outcome. Extremism renders one blind and deaf to discussion, new ideas and growth. All Americans, including Imam Rauf, should be aware and follow the agenda of the OIC. Not in a paranoid state of hysteria, but in a rational, methodical and vigilant manner to ensure madness does not rule the day for either side of the spectrum.
Although Americans do not have a monopoly on goodness and truth, they do possess an attractive piece of the market. Arrogance? Maybe its just well deserved and earned pride, Imam Rauf.
PS - You can disagree vehemently with this article without fear of punishment, imprisonment or execution. The author, on the other hand, may have just signed his death warrant with the OIC.
by Paul D. McInerny
How's that for a headline? Talk about tabloid journalism, but if the Saudi-based Organization of Islamic States (OIC) found the following blog offensive, I could be imprisoned or executed for the international crime of Blasphemy Against Islam. You read correctly. An international crime for blasphemy or ridicule of Islam. This blog entry is an observation and opinion to address some key issues:
1. Imam Rauf's remarks concerning the arrogance of Americans
2. Research regarding author's Nina Shea and Paul Marshall
3. The Saudi-based Organization of Islamic States (OIC) and their goals
The article does not address issues regarding:
1. Christianity vs. Islam
2. Controversy at Ground Zero
1. Imam Rauf: The Arrogance of Americans
While America and the rest of the world remain on the alert for gun toting, bomb carrying radical, Islamic terrorist, evidence suggests a more subtle approach may be occurring. A smoke screen of misdirected blame and anger renders the world near-sighted to the bigger picture.
The following introduction to Imam Rauf was taken from the CNN web site: Feisal Abdul Rauf is chairman of the nonprofit organization Cordoba Initiative and imam of Masjid al-Farah, a mosque in Lower Manhattan, and he is a planner of the proposed Islamic community center near ground zero. He gave the talk above in October 2009. Below is an excerpt from his book, "What's Right With Islam.”
“Americans must outgrow the unbecoming arrogance that leads us to assert that America somehow owns a monopoly on goodness and truth -- a belief that leads some to view the world as but a stage on which to play out the great historical drama: the United States of America versus the Powers of Evil.”
Ouch. Unbecoming arrogance. Imam Rauf lectures Americans as if he were a father scolding his insolent children. Unbecoming arrogance? There probably isn't a country in the world that isn't viewed by someone as arrogant, so how should one interpret Imam Rauf and his words? What countries or what part of the world views Americans as arrogant? Perhaps Americans are viewed as arrogant because our governments position after 9/11 was that you were either with us or against us. Merriam-Webster defines arrogance as an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions.
American’s do possess a certain attitude, but also know that they do not have a monopoly on goodness and truth. Is it arrogance or could it be pride? While not perfect by any means, America is a country that is constantly evolving. It is a country like no other, in that it was literally created by its people. When it stood defiantly against England and declared its independence, the founding fathers chose a government that was run by the people. They did not choose a dictatorship or monarchy, but rather a government that represented the common man.
America, like most countries, has a past. Indeed, its expansion was a brutal acquisition of land from its native inhabitants. America enslaved an entire race of people and suffered a civil war. During World War II, it interned American born Japanese and later, denied basic civil rights to African Americans. America is fluid in that it is capable of change and has evolved to where it is today.
Despite its sordid past, America is the country that appears to be admired by most of the world. People came to America and still come to America for a better life. Imam Rauf chose America as his home when he came in 1965 and became a citizen approximately 15 years later. Parents from other countries send their children here for quality education, to study at our colleges and universities.
Imam Rauf talks of America's "...historical drama: The United States versus The Powers of Evil." He says that as if it were something bad and appears to diminish or tarnish the United States and her role in the world. Imam Rauf is an American now, and perhaps he has glossed over parts of our history that he considers "historical drama." Maybe it has all been just historical drama when America helped her friends in time of need. She was there in World War I and the conflicts in Korea and Vietnam. After the surrender of Japan in World War II, America provided assistance to Japan to help them rebuild their war torn country. It was America and her allies that responded to the call for help from Kuwait and chased the invaders away. Historical drama, indeed.
Some evil appears in a different form. It could be pride from the fact that it is America that usually is the first to provide aid to any country suffering from catastrophic events such as tsunamis, earthquakes, floods and other natural disasters.
Americans are proud of their heritage and the standard of freedom that allows debate, challenges to the status quo, and the freedom to criticize its leaders and call them to the carpet. Americans are proud of their ability to travel unrestrained throughout this great country. They are proud of a government that functions by a set of laws and not the whim of any one person.
It is in America that one can burn the American flag and draw unflattering cartoons of the president of the United States. It is America where one can belong to or make light of the many, many religions flourishing in the country. It is in America, Imam Rauf, and not an Islamic based country, where people can actually have a critical debate on religion or politics. It is in America and not an Islamic based country, where one can feel free and unthreatened to put words to paper such as these.
Perfect? Absolutely not. One of the best countries in the world? Absolutely.
Because of our standard of living and our leadership in the free world, we have enemies who want to destroy us simply because our values do not coincide with theirs. They are intolerant of the United States. Americans just honored its 9th memory of the horrific events of September 11, 2001. The events that unfolded that day were caused by Islamic terrorists; a group of men who subverted the teachings in the Quran to justify their hatred toward Americans. Presidents Bush and Obama reminded us that we are not at war with Islam. September 11, 2001, was the result of evil, Islamic extremists.
2. Nina Shea and Paul Marshall
3. The Organization of Islamic States (OIC)
Imam Rauf is said to be a man of peace and that Islam, like most religions, is a religion of peace. Yet, there is a certain air of arrogance and intolerance on a segment of the Muslim world concerning the religion of Islam and they are not what one would immediately identify as extremists. Remember the Merriam-Webster definition that arrogance is an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions.
Let us look at “overbearing manner.” Pastor Terry Jone’s threatened to burn the Quran and many Muslims and non-Muslims found the idea offensive. The governments of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Sudan not only perceived the threat as offensive, but also a deliberate act of blasphemy, punishable by imprisonment or even execution. These countries and others belong to the Saudi-based Organization of Islamic States (OIC).
Nina Shea and Paul Marshall, Senior Fellows with Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom and co-authors of the forthcoming book “Silenced” wrote an article detailing what a reasonable person could construe as an over bearing manner. The OIC is increasingly intolerant of those who would dare speak ill of Islam. Nancy Gibbs, Senior Editor for Time Magazine wrote, "Intolerance comes in many forms; arrogance is one of them, as is dismissing one's opponents as being ignorant or bigoted rather than drawn deeply to different principles or priorities."
Since Feb. 14, 1989, when Iranian Ayatollah Khomeini pronounced Salman Rushdie a blasphemer and ordered his murder, the OIC lobbied Western governments to repress ridicule and critique of Islam, and dissent within Islam, in ways analogous to the repression already existing in many of its own countries.
So now we have governments, not demented individuals, intolerant of any ridicule or critique of Islam. The OIC lobbied to silence critics of Islam and is making progress toward that goal. This appears to be arrogant and over bearing.
For example, in the United Nations, the OIC has for over a decade successfully sponsored annual resolutions calling for the creation of an international crime against "defamation" of Islam. This demand that Western governments use state power to coerce compliance by their own citizens with Islamic blasphemy strictures is therefore relatively new.
The OIC wants an international crime against the defamation of Islam. While Imam Rauf talks of dialogue and tolerance, the OIC demands that any critique of Islam should be criminal throughout the world. The OIC has been successful for over a decade sponsoring resolutions toward an international crime. If you have listened to any of the news channels lately, almost all of their guests and some of the hosts would be guilty of blasphemy against Islam.
Western Europe, Canada and Australia have reacted to this demand largely ad hoc; they are beginning to deploy racial and religious hate-speech bans to serve as proxies for Muslim blasphemy laws.
Most Americans and probably the rest of the world are unaware of the repercussions the OIC’s demands have had on free speech.
Politician Geert Wilders is now on trial in the Netherlands for his statements, and for his film "Fitna," in which he sharply critiques the Quran and calls on Muslims to destroy it. In Germany, a man was recently convicted for the sacrilegious treatment of the word "Quran," not the Islamic sacred text itself. Since the mid-1990s, prosecutors in Finland, Canada and the Netherlands have trawled the websites of anti-immigration advocates looking for anti-Islamic comments.
In France, Canada, Norway and Italy, publishers, editors and authors – such as Mark Steyn – have been tried for inciting religious hostility and insulting religious sensibilities with their critiques of Islam and Muslim immigration.
It should come as no surprise then that former French actress Brigitte Bardot “has been convicted and fined five times under hate-speech laws for denouncing Islamic slaughter practices and making other derogatory statements concerning Islamic practices.”
Authors Shea and Marshall say that so far the United States is an exception, “with its strong protections of free speech under the First Amendment. In the United States, neither blasphemy nor hate speech are violations of the law. ("Hate crimes" simply provide for enhanced penalties when traditional crimes are directed against certain protected groups).”
As applied in OIC states, blasphemy rules can touch on every area of human endeavor. At stake are the freedoms of religion and expression that lie at the heart of our liberal democracy.
“The late Indonesian president Abdurrhaman Wahid warned that such efforts "play directly into the hands of fundamentalists, who wish to avoid all criticism of their attempts to narrow the scope of discourse regarding Islam, and to inter 1.3 billion Muslims in a narrow, suffocating chamber of dogmatism."
America and the rest of the world have concerned themselves with the extremist-those that would do us immediate and physical harm. While the extremists are banging on the front door, moderates are quietly coming in through the rear door. There are many good, decent and well meaning Americans who are opening that rear door. Perhaps they do not understand or refuse to believe the intentions of the Organization of Islamic States regarding Islam.
Final Word
Imam Rauf talks of the arrogance of Americans and our opposition to evil. In the context of this article, evil arrogance and intolerance is the belief criticism of Islam is punishable by imprisonment or execution. Evil arrogance and intolerance is the belief criticism of Islam should be an international crime. Evil arrogance and intolerance is the belief Islam should be the only religion above reproach, critique, discussion and questioning. Finally, arrogance is lecturing to your fellow Americans that our "great historical drama" is some how to blame for the events of 9/11. An evil, demented and intolerant ideology of extremists was the basic cause of 9/11.
Let us not succumb to intolerance, panic or hate because one follows Islam, but let us not close our eyes to the OIC and its goals for the sake of tolerance. There are governments who would have Americans feel guilty for all the ills of the world, but Americans have every right to be proud of their country and the ideals by which it was founded. We have stumbled, picked ourselves up, dusted off the dirt and marched forward. We have recognized and acknowledged our weaknesses, but are buoyed by our basic philosophy of decency and freedom that most of the world respects while members of the OIC detest.
Extremism for any ideology rarely has a productive outcome. Extremism renders one blind and deaf to discussion, new ideas and growth. All Americans, including Imam Rauf, should be aware and follow the agenda of the OIC. Not in a paranoid state of hysteria, but in a rational, methodical and vigilant manner to ensure madness does not rule the day for either side of the spectrum.
Although Americans do not have a monopoly on goodness and truth, they do possess an attractive piece of the market. Arrogance? Maybe its just well deserved and earned pride, Imam Rauf.
PS - You can disagree vehemently with this article without fear of punishment, imprisonment or execution. The author, on the other hand, may have just signed his death warrant with the OIC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
